No single tool wins for everyone: biometric platforms secure large perimeters, payroll-led tools nail time and attendance, and only The Site Book's Site Control generates the UK CDM pack while controlling per-site contractor access.
UK construction site-access software splits two ways: hardware-led biometric turnstiles (MSite/Biosite, Donseed) for securing large perimeters, and software-only sign-in and workforce tools (Chime, SiteConnect, HammerTech) for attendance and induction. The Site Book's Site Control is the only one that also generates the UK CDM pack, including RAMS, CPP and COSHH, and runs RFIs and contractor-company isolation per site, with unlimited workers on a transparent per-site price.
Figures and features are taken from public vendor pricing and product pages fetched on 2026-06-06; quote-only vendors are flagged where no public price exists.
From £675/site per month plus £5,000 one-off setup; volume tiers and annual prepay
Quote-only — no public per-user figures; ROI calculator on site, talk to sales
Quote-only, plus hardware capex per site (turnstile/biometric reader install).
Quote-only — no public pricing; contact Causeway for a tailored quote based on site count, hardware and worker volume.
Quote-only flat subscription scaled by annual construction volume and active job sites; no per-user fee, unlimited users, subcontractors free, implementation and support bundled.
From NZD $333/mo (1-9 employees) up to NZD $816/mo (40-69); 70+ employees is Price-On-Application. Contractors join free; you pay per employee headcount band.
Team size
Per active site with unlimited workers (~75+ typical); multiple contractor companies per site
Best for growing subcontractor firms with payrolled and CIS workforces, from roughly 20 operatives upward
Large enterprise workforces — hundreds to thousands of operatives across multiple secured sites.
Mid-size to large contractors and labour-heavy operations with payroll accuracy as the primary driver.
Enterprise GC safety, operations and EHS teams managing many concurrent projects and large subcontractor pools.
Strongest at 1-39 employees where the published per-headcount tiers stay cheap; 70+ moves to quote-only.
Best for
Principal contractors and builders running live sites with subcontractors who need UK CDM documents generated plus on-site contractor access, attendance, RFIs and audit-ready evidence in one per-site tool.
Subcontractors and labour-heavy trades digitising timesheets, CIS payroll and field workforce management across multiple sites
Tier-1 and large main contractors securing high-value, high-throughput sites that need physical perimeter access control with biometric verification.
Construction contractors who want to eliminate time theft and buddy-punching with biometric attendance feeding accurate build-up-to-gross payroll.
Mid-to-large general contractors running multiple job sites who want one mature EHS and site-operations platform with optional turnstiles and equipment management.
Small-to-mid NZ/AU/UK contractors who want an affordable, published-price H&S platform with geofenced sign-in, inductions and free contractor connectivity, and who do not need software to generate UK CDM documents.
Not ideal for
No biometric turnstiles or physical access control, so it cannot secure a Tier-1 perimeter the way MSite/Biosite can.
Distributes RAMS rather than generating them — no built-in UK RAMS/CPP/COSHH document creation, so the compliance pack still has to be authored elsewhere.
Hardware-led: turnstile/reader install means capex, lead time and groundworks per site, slowing deployment on small or short-duration jobs.
Quote-only pricing with biometric hardware capex makes budgeting slower and entry costs higher than a no-hardware QR deployment.
Runs US-style JHAs, Safety Plans and SDS and does not generate UK RAMS, CPP or COSHH documents, so UK CDM packs still need a separate tool.
Does not generate UK CDM documents (RAMS/CPP/COSHH); SWMS/JSA/SSSP are AU/NZ equivalents, so UK builders still author RAMS elsewhere.
RAMS / CPP / COSHH generation
Generates UK RAMS, CPP, COSHH and method statements from the project brief — unique in this category.
Permits to work
Document distribution and digital forms/checklists can cover permit-style sign-offs, but there is no dedicated named permit-to-work workflow advertised.
Briefings, RAMS sign-off and access gating cover much permit-style control; no dedicated permit-to-work issuance module is publicly documented.
Dedicated Permits module within the Coordinate workflow; permit depth is a recognised HammerTech strength.
Site inductions
Digital induction blocks check-in until acknowledged.
Digital site inductions are a core feature, delivered in-app alongside RAMS and toolbox talks.
Online inductions software with forms, videos, questionnaires and 30+ language auto-translation; access is gated via biometric verification before entry.
Ensures workers complete safety training and site inductions before site access — induction gating is explicitly advertised.
Orientations and worker onboarding module gates worker readiness before site access.
Standardised site inductions for contractors are a core feature, but block-until-complete gating that hard-stops check-in is not documented.
Worker cert tracking
CSCS upload, internal review and expiry notifications.
Skills and certifications (including CSCS-type competencies) are tracked per worker as part of workforce/subcontractor management.
Competency and credential management is part of the workforce suite; credentials are checked against the worker before access is granted.
Tracks training and qualifications/competency records as part of the digital worker ID; supports verified audit trails.
Worker info, qualifications and orientation tracking with expiry handling as part of subcontractor management.
Contractor management and registers cover compliance documents; competency/cert expiry alerting is lighter than a dedicated CSCS tracker.
Right to work
CSCS credential review; not a formal right-to-work share-code check.
Right-to-work verification is included in onboarding/subcontractor management.
Identity checks and pre-registration support right-to-work/identity verification at enrolment, strengthened by biometric identity confirmation at the gate.
Tracks Right-to-Work records as part of compliance audit trail; stronger formal RtW than Site Control's CSCS-review-only approach.
Captures worker credentials and onboarding data; UK right-to-work share-code verification is not a documented native feature.
Contractor self-onboarding
Contractor self-join via the entrance QR with CSCS upload and approval.
Strong subcontractor onboarding and management is core, though it is framed as employer-driven onboarding rather than a worker self-enrolment QR flow.
Pre-registration software lets subcontractors and workers self pre-enrol and complete induction before their start date.
Worker enrolment is supported via the mobile app and biometric capture, but onboarding is generally enrolment-led rather than contractor-company self pre-enrolment.
Subcontractor management lets sub firms self-complete onboarding; subcontractor access is free.
Contractors connect free without a licence fee and self-manage their company profile and compliance via contractor management.
QR / mobile sign-in
Permanent entrance QR for guest sign-in/out and contractor self-join.
Sign-in/out is via the iOS/Android app with GPS capture; not positioned around a fixed entrance QR for guests/contractors.
Primary model is biometric turnstiles plus Workforce/Supervisor apps; sign-in is hardware-led rather than a no-hardware QR entrance.
Primary check-in is biometric readers plus a GPS mobile app for remote workers; not positioned as a no-hardware QR sign-in like Site Control's entrance QR.
IronGate access supports QR codes and pin codes alongside facial recognition; mobile app handles field sign-in.
Public QR code sign-in lets visitors check in without downloading the app.
GPS clock-in
GPS-verified clock-in is a headline feature — location captured at sign-in/out to confirm who is on site in real time.
GPS mobile app with 'virtual GPS ring fencing' geofences sites even before physical boundaries exist — a genuine win over Site Control.
Attendance is captured via turnstiles and app; geofenced GPS clock-in is not a documented core feature.
Geofencing sets virtual boundaries around sites and auto signs users in/out on entry, exit or dwell.
Biometric access
Core strength — MSite Face facial recognition and Biosite fingerprint/facial readers confirm identity before access.
Core differentiator: fingerprint and facial-recognition devices verify identity to the minute and eliminate buddy-punching. Site Control has no biometric.
IronGate partner turnstiles provide facial-recognition biometric access, purchasable directly through HammerTech.
Physical access control
Full/half-height turnstiles, Pod units, cabins and gates provide a physical secured perimeter — the flagship capability.
Biometric readers/tablets gate logging at site points; can integrate with hardware, but it is not primarily a turnstile/gate access-control platform.
IronGate facial-recognition turnstiles and gates engineered for harsh construction conditions.
Site attendance
Check-in/out, history and a live people-on-site view.
Time & attendance is foundational; digital timesheets are auto-created at sign-in/out with real-time hours.
Time and attendance with timesheets and labour-hour management captured at biometric turnstiles.
Captures hours worked to the minute via biometrics with automated overtime — the product's central T&A capability.
Site Access plus IronGate sync labour hours and attendance in real time.
Attendance is one of the four core pillars, recording site visitors and sign-in/out times.
CIS payroll
Hours flow straight to payroll with CIS calculated automatically — a clear differentiator versus Site Control.
Labour-hour/timesheet data supports CIS/IR35 workflows via integrations; not positioned as an in-product timesheet-to-pay engine.
Builds up to gross pay with automated overtime and expense claims feeding payroll; a clear win over Site Control, which has no payroll.
Live people-on-site
Real-time field management shows who is on site at any moment via GPS-verified clock-ins.
Real-time on-site monitoring and attendance from turnstile entry/exit supports muster and roll-call.
Real-time monitoring across multiple locations shows who is on site; supports labour tracking and audit trails.
Turnstile and access data give real-time who-is-onsite visibility for muster and evacuation.
Real-time attendance records who is on site, supporting evacuation and muster needs.
Multi-company isolation
Each contractor company sees only its own workforce — test-verified.
Built to manage in-house teams and subcontractors together from a contractor's account; no advertised test-verified per-contractor-company data isolation portal.
Enterprise workforce management with subcontractor onboarding implies role/company scoping; per-contractor data isolation is not a publicly verified, test-backed claim.
Built for contractors managing their own and subcontractor labour, but multi-contractor-company data isolation is not advertised or test-verified as it is in Site Control.
Built around GC-managed projects with free subcontractor access; per-company data isolation is implied by role model but not publicly test-verified.
Contractor management connects multiple companies, but per-contractor data-isolation guarantees are not independently test-verified in public docs.
RFIs
Create, attach, comment, answer and close — unique in this category.
Document-review evidence
Version-specific read/acknowledge audit chain.
Documents are distributed and acknowledged in-app, but there is no advertised version-specific read/acknowledge audit chain like Site Control's.
RAMS digital briefings record sign-off, and inductions capture acknowledgement, providing a read/acknowledge audit trail.
Records induction and training completion with audit trails, but not version-specific document-review acknowledgement chains like Site Control.
Bulletins and safety meetings capture acknowledgements; a version-specific document-review audit chain is not explicitly documented.
Toolbox talks capture digital signatures and attendance; a version-specific read/acknowledge audit chain for documents is not clearly evidenced.
Toolbox talks
Toolbox talks are distributed and acknowledged in-app alongside RAMS.
Briefings module broadcasts safety briefings/toolbox talks with verified sign-off via the worker apps and gate.
Health & safety and training tracking is supported; broadcast-and-acknowledge toolbox talks are not specifically advertised as a discrete feature.
Safety Meetings and Bulletins modules cover broadcast toolbox talks and acknowledgement.
Toolbox talks support scheduling, attendance tracking and digital signatures for daily briefings.
Site inspections
Inspections and checklists are part of the platform, with photo and location capture.
Broader Infobric/QHSE tooling covers inspections; not a core advertised feature of the MSite access-control module itself.
Mature Inspections module within the Report workflow; inspections maturity is a HammerTech strength.
Pre-start checklists and customisable mobile forms cover daily site safety inspections (PPE, barriers, signage).
Incident log
Digital forms/checklists and reporting can capture incidents, but a dedicated incident log is not separately named in public materials.
Fatigue management and QHSE tooling touch on incident/safety reporting; a dedicated incident log is not prominently documented in the access-control module.
Includes H&S and fatigue management with audit trails, but a structured incident log is not an advertised standalone feature.
Incidents and Injuries module for reporting, tracking and investigation.
Incident and injury management lets teams report and investigate incidents with custom workflows.
Plant / asset management
Asset tracking is an advertised module — an area Site Control does not cover.
Equipment Management module covers plant and equipment registers and inspections.
Workforce scheduling
Real-time field/workforce management is central, though public materials emphasise time capture and management rather than dispatch/rostering.
Labour requisitioning helps plan labour needs, but full dispatch/rostering scheduling is not a headline feature.
Provides labour tracking and fatigue management; full dispatch/rostering scheduling is not a headline Donseed feature. Site Control has no scheduling either.
Multi-site dashboard & exports
Attendance CSV, monthly H&S CSV/PDF and project audit-log exports.
Centralised multi-site view with real-time management reporting and PDF/share/save exports.
Multi-site dashboards and reporting consolidate attendance, labour hours and compliance across a contractor's project portfolio.
Real-time monitoring across multiple locations with project insights for commercial, operations and H&S, plus payroll/timesheet reporting.
Reporting and Insights real-time analytics dashboard spans multiple job sites with exportable data.
Compliance dashboard with real-time analytics and PDF export supports audits across sites.
Mobile app
iOS and Android contractor app.
Native iOS and Android app (Chime Construction Software) for clock-in, documents and checklists.
Workforce App and Supervisor App provide mobile access for workers and site supervisors.
Native mobile app (iOS/Android) with GPS clock-in for remote workers, alongside fixed biometric readers/tablets on site.
Native iOS and Android apps linked from the platform pages for field use.
Native mobile app on iOS and Android gives workers access to materials from their phone.
Offline mode
Field app captures data on site; an explicit offline mode is not confirmed in public materials.
Turnstile hardware operates locally at the gate, but documented offline behaviour for the apps is not publicly specified.
Online and offline modes explicitly advertised to remove reliance on signal coverage — a confirmed win over Site Control's partial/unknown offline.
Mobile app is used in the field; offline capability is plausible but not explicitly documented on public pages.
Mobile-first field use is emphasised but offline capture behaviour is not clearly documented.
Who each tool is for
At-a-glance fit per product - pulled from the same data that drives the snapshot table.
The Site Book Site Control
Best for
Principal contractors and builders running live sites with subcontractors who need UK CDM documents generated plus on-site contractor access, attendance, RFIs and audit-ready evidence in one per-site tool.
Not ideal for
No biometric turnstiles or physical access control, so it cannot secure a Tier-1 perimeter the way MSite/Biosite can.
Team size
Per active site with unlimited workers (~75+ typical); multiple contractor companies per site
Chime Software
Best for
Subcontractors and labour-heavy trades digitising timesheets, CIS payroll and field workforce management across multiple sites
Not ideal for
Distributes RAMS rather than generating them — no built-in UK RAMS/CPP/COSHH document creation, so the compliance pack still has to be authored elsewhere.
Team size
Best for growing subcontractor firms with payrolled and CIS workforces, from roughly 20 operatives upward
MSite / Biosite
Best for
Tier-1 and large main contractors securing high-value, high-throughput sites that need physical perimeter access control with biometric verification.
Not ideal for
Hardware-led: turnstile/reader install means capex, lead time and groundworks per site, slowing deployment on small or short-duration jobs.
Team size
Large enterprise workforces — hundreds to thousands of operatives across multiple secured sites.
Causeway Donseed (CausewayOne Attendance)
Best for
Construction contractors who want to eliminate time theft and buddy-punching with biometric attendance feeding accurate build-up-to-gross payroll.
Not ideal for
Quote-only pricing with biometric hardware capex makes budgeting slower and entry costs higher than a no-hardware QR deployment.
Team size
Mid-size to large contractors and labour-heavy operations with payroll accuracy as the primary driver.
HammerTech
Best for
Mid-to-large general contractors running multiple job sites who want one mature EHS and site-operations platform with optional turnstiles and equipment management.
Not ideal for
Runs US-style JHAs, Safety Plans and SDS and does not generate UK RAMS, CPP or COSHH documents, so UK CDM packs still need a separate tool.
Team size
Enterprise GC safety, operations and EHS teams managing many concurrent projects and large subcontractor pools.
SiteConnect
Best for
Small-to-mid NZ/AU/UK contractors who want an affordable, published-price H&S platform with geofenced sign-in, inductions and free contractor connectivity, and who do not need software to generate UK CDM documents.
Not ideal for
Does not generate UK CDM documents (RAMS/CPP/COSHH); SWMS/JSA/SSSP are AU/NZ equivalents, so UK builders still author RAMS elsewhere.
Team size
Strongest at 1-39 employees where the published per-headcount tiers stay cheap; 70+ moves to quote-only.
The bottom line
Pick the option that matches how your team actually works.
Choose The Site Book Site Control if…
Site Control is the only option that generates UK RAMS, CPP and COSHH and runs per-site contractor access, attendance and RFIs together.
Recommended for: Principal contractor needing CDM compliance and access in one tool
Choose MSite / Biosite if…
MSite/Biosite's biometric turnstiles physically lock the perimeter, which software-only tools including Site Control cannot do.
Recommended for: Tier-1 contractor securing a high-value perimeter
From £675/site per month plus £5,000 one-off setup; volume tiers and annual prepay
Best for
Principal contractors and builders running live sites with subcontractors who need UK CDM documents generated plus on-site contractor access, attendance, RFIs and audit-ready evidence in one per-site tool.
Team size
Per active site with unlimited workers (~75+ typical); multiple contractor companies per site
Sweet spot
A principal contractor running one or more active sites who must generate the CDM pack, control who is inducted and on site, run RFIs, and produce audit-ready attendance and H&S exports without hardware.
Strengths
Generates the full UK CDM pack — RAMS, CPP, COSHH and method statements — and captures sign-off on site; no direct competitor in this category generates UK compliance documents.
Per-site pricing with unlimited workers (~75+) and test-verified multi-contractor-company data isolation, instead of per-seat or per-turnstile economics.
No hardware: a permanent entrance QR plus mobile app means a new site goes live in days with no turnstile capex or install.
Combines RFIs, document-review evidence, CSCS and induction gating, attendance and audit-grade exports in one tool, replacing a stack of point solutions.
Weaknesses
No biometric turnstiles or physical access control, so it cannot secure a Tier-1 perimeter the way MSite/Biosite can.
No CIS payroll or GPS-geofenced clock-in, so payroll-accuracy-led buyers may prefer Chime or Donseed.
No plant/asset management or workforce scheduling — adjacent operations tools cover those.
New plan on a recently launched product, with a shorter track record than established incumbents.
Quote-only — no public per-user figures; ROI calculator on site, talk to sales
Best for
Subcontractors and labour-heavy trades digitising timesheets, CIS payroll and field workforce management across multiple sites
Team size
Best for growing subcontractor firms with payrolled and CIS workforces, from roughly 20 operatives upward
Sweet spot
A subcontractor running mobile crews who wants GPS-verified clock-in flowing straight into CIS payroll, with RAMS distribution and asset tracking bundled in
Strengths
GPS-verified clock-in feeding digital timesheets straight into CIS payroll with calculations automated — a genuinely strong field-to-pay pipeline Site Control does not attempt.
Hardware-free deployment that explicitly removes the burden of hardware procurement, making it fast and cheap to roll out across mobile crews.
Broad workforce-management footprint: T&A, onboarding, skills, right-to-work, asset tracking and inspections in one subcontractor-focused platform.
Real-time multi-site reporting with native iOS/Android apps, well suited to labour-heavy subcontractors managing operatives across many jobs.
Weaknesses
Distributes RAMS rather than generating them — no built-in UK RAMS/CPP/COSHH document creation, so the compliance pack still has to be authored elsewhere.
No request-for-information (RFI) workflow or version-specific document-review audit chain, so project Q&A and acknowledgement evidence live outside the tool.
Quote-only pricing with no public per-user figures on the UK site (just an ROI calculator), making budgeting harder for smaller buyers.
Built around a contractor managing its own workforce, not multi-contractor-company data isolation for a principal contractor running a shared site.
Quote-only, plus hardware capex per site (turnstile/biometric reader install).
Best for
Tier-1 and large main contractors securing high-value, high-throughput sites that need physical perimeter access control with biometric verification.
Team size
Large enterprise workforces — hundreds to thousands of operatives across multiple secured sites.
Sweet spot
Major projects where a biometric turnstile perimeter, fatigue management and labour-hour reporting justify hardware capex and a quote-based rollout.
Strengths
Best-in-class physical security: biometric facial/fingerprint turnstiles, Pods and gates create a genuinely controlled site perimeter for high-value projects.
End-to-end Tier-1 workforce platform — pre-registration, induction, access, T&A, briefings, RAMS approval and labour reporting in one enterprise suite.
Identity confidence: facial recognition confirms the actual worker and their credentials at the gate, hard to spoof versus card or QR sign-in.
Multi-site dashboards and labour-hour reporting suit large main contractors managing big subcontractor populations across many sites.
Weaknesses
Hardware-led: turnstile/reader install means capex, lead time and groundworks per site, slowing deployment on small or short-duration jobs.
Quote-only pricing with no public price makes fast self-serve evaluation and budgeting harder for SME builders.
RAMS module approves and distributes uploaded documents rather than generating UK CDM RAMS/CPP/COSHH content for you.
No request-for-information (RFI) workflow, and offline/data-isolation specifics are not publicly verifiable.
Quote-only — no public pricing; contact Causeway for a tailored quote based on site count, hardware and worker volume.
Best for
Construction contractors who want to eliminate time theft and buddy-punching with biometric attendance feeding accurate build-up-to-gross payroll.
Team size
Mid-size to large contractors and labour-heavy operations with payroll accuracy as the primary driver.
Sweet spot
Labour-intensive sites where shaving minutes of inaccurate paid time and proving exact hours-to-the-minute justifies biometric hardware and per-quote cost.
Strengths
Biometric fingerprint and facial verification captures hours to the minute and eliminates buddy-punching and time theft.
Build-up-to-gross payroll with automated overtime and expense claims links attendance directly to accurate pay.
GPS mobile app with virtual ring-fencing geofences sites even before physical boundaries are built.
Explicit online and offline modes keep capture working without reliable signal coverage.
Backed by Causeway Technologies, a large established UK construction-software vendor with a broad workforce suite.
Weaknesses
Quote-only pricing with biometric hardware capex makes budgeting slower and entry costs higher than a no-hardware QR deployment.
No document generation — it stores and distributes H&S records but does not produce UK RAMS, CPP or COSHH packs.
No RFI workflow or version-specific document-review acknowledgement chain for site coordination and compliance evidence.
Multi-contractor-company data isolation is not advertised or test-verified, so it is less suited to mixed-trade open-site access.
Quote-only flat subscription scaled by annual construction volume and active job sites; no per-user fee, unlimited users, subcontractors free, implementation and support bundled.
Best for
Mid-to-large general contractors running multiple job sites who want one mature EHS and site-operations platform with optional turnstiles and equipment management.
Team size
Enterprise GC safety, operations and EHS teams managing many concurrent projects and large subcontractor pools.
Sweet spot
Multi-site GCs in the US/AU/UK that prioritise breadth of safety modules, permit depth and access-control hardware over UK-CDM document generation or self-serve speed.
Strengths
Most feature-complete rival in this comparison set: deep permits, mature inspections, incidents and equipment/plant management in one platform.
Optional IronGate facial-recognition turnstiles and gates give hardware-grade physical access control that lighter tools cannot match.
No per-user fee with unlimited users and free subcontractor access, plus implementation, training and support bundled into the subscription.
Long track record across the US, Australia and UK with mid-to-large general contractors and enterprise EHS teams.
Weaknesses
Runs US-style JHAs, Safety Plans and SDS and does not generate UK RAMS, CPP or COSHH documents, so UK CDM packs still need a separate tool.
Quote-only pricing with no public figures and a volume-based annual fee makes fast budgeting and self-serve adoption harder for smaller UK builders.
No request-for-information (RFI) workflow, which collaboration-heavy site teams may expect.
Breadth and enterprise onboarding suit larger contractors; a single small UK site can be heavier and slower to deploy than a self-serve per-site product.
From NZD $333/mo (1-9 employees) up to NZD $816/mo (40-69); 70+ employees is Price-On-Application. Contractors join free; you pay per employee headcount band.
Best for
Small-to-mid NZ/AU/UK contractors who want an affordable, published-price H&S platform with geofenced sign-in, inductions and free contractor connectivity, and who do not need software to generate UK CDM documents.
Team size
Strongest at 1-39 employees where the published per-headcount tiers stay cheap; 70+ moves to quote-only.
Sweet spot
A growing sub-40-employee builder or subcontractor wanting low-cost geofenced attendance, inductions and incident logging without per-site setup fees.
Strengths
Published per-headcount pricing from NZD $333/mo makes it genuinely affordable for small teams, with no setup fee.
Contractors connect free without licence fees, lowering the cost of bringing subcontractors onto the platform.
Geofenced auto sign-in/out plus QR and kiosk options give flexible, hardware-light attendance capture.
Solid H&S core: inductions, incident management, pre-start inspections, toolbox talks and SWMS/JSA in one place.
Native iOS/Android app keeps field workers and visitors signing in from their phones.
Weaknesses
Does not generate UK CDM documents (RAMS/CPP/COSHH); SWMS/JSA/SSSP are AU/NZ equivalents, so UK builders still author RAMS elsewhere.
No RFI workflow or version-specific document-review acknowledgement chain for project coordination and audit evidence.
Per-employee tiers mean a single 75-worker site lands in the 70+ Price-On-Application band, eroding the small-team price advantage at scale.
No CIS payroll, plant/asset management, or workforce scheduling for builders wanting those adjacent workflows.
Short, straight answers - the same questions real builders ask.
What is the best construction site access software in the UK?
It depends on what you need. For securing a Tier-1 perimeter, MSite/Biosite's biometric turnstiles lead. For biometric time and attendance feeding CIS payroll, Causeway Donseed is strong. For a principal contractor who must generate UK CDM documents such as RAMS, CPP and COSHH and run per-site contractor access, attendance and RFIs in one tool, The Site Book's Site Control is the only option that combines document generation with on-site access.
Does site access software handle RAMS and CDM paperwork?
Most do not generate it. Tools like Chime, SiteConnect and WhosOnLocation store or distribute documents, and HammerTech produces US-style JHAs rather than UK RAMS. Only The Site Book's Site Control generates the full UK CDM pack, including RAMS, CPP, COSHH and method statements, from the project brief and captures worker sign-off on site, so the compliance documents and the access control live in one platform instead of two.
Is per-site or per-user pricing better for site access software?
For a busy site with many workers, per-site pricing is usually cheaper. Per-user tools like Assignar or SiteConnect scale with headcount, so a 75-worker site adds up fast or lands in a quote-only tier. Site Control charges a flat per-site fee, from £675 per site per month plus setup, with unlimited workers, which stays predictable when dozens of operatives and subcontractors come and go from one project over its life.
Do you need hardware for construction site access control?
Not always. Biometric systems from MSite/Biosite and Causeway Donseed install turnstiles or fingerprint readers per site, which adds capital cost and lead time but physically secures the perimeter. Software-only tools, including Chime, SiteConnect, GoContractor and The Site Book's Site Control, use a QR code or mobile sign-in, so a new site goes live in days with no install. Choose hardware only if you genuinely need a locked perimeter.
Which site access tool is best for small UK builders?
Smaller teams that only need cheap sign-in and inductions can start with SiteConnect, which publishes low per-employee pricing. Builders who must produce CDM paperwork and control contractor access on live jobs are better served by The Site Book's Site Control, which generates RAMS, CPP and COSHH and runs attendance, RFIs and audit exports per site. Heavy biometric or payroll platforms are usually overkill for a small builder.
How we built this comparison
Figures and features are taken from public vendor pricing and product pages fetched on 2026-06-06; quote-only vendors are flagged where no public price exists.
Every pricing, feature, and fit claim in this comparison is pulled from public vendor documentation and cross-checked against independent sources. The “source basis” footer on each product card lists the exact URLs and the date we fetched them. We revisit this page at least every 90 days - last reviewed on .