Skip to main content

Honest comparison

Best RAMS Software for Sole Traders (UK 2026)

For a team of one, this ranking is about economics, not features - budget, self-serve signup, and how many RAMS you actually write a month. The Site Book wins at any regular cadence with its £30/mo flat rate covering the full CDM suite, but RapidRAMS beats it on pure maths if you only write one or two documents a month at about £15 per RAMS. Breakeven lands at roughly two RAMS a month: below that, pay-per-document is cheaper; above that, flat-rate pays for itself. RAMs App is a reasonable middle ground for template browsers; CDM Wizard is a free learning starting point; Word and Excel are not recommended for anyone invoicing real clients.

Reviewed

Nicola Dobbie, Founder of The Site Book
Nicola Dobbie·Founder, The Site Book

Based on publicly available vendor pricing and documentation reviewed 2026-04-15.

At-a-glance comparison

Pricing, fit, and feature coverage side by side.

FeatureThe Site BookRapidRAMSRAMs AppCDM WizardExcel templates
Pricingfrom £30/mo£15 per document, no subscriptionfrom £24/moFreeMicrosoft 365 licence (£7.90+/mo per user) + your time
Team size1–50Solo / occasionalAll contractorsAny -learning toolAny
Best forSmall-to-mid UK builders (1–50 users) who need a full CDM pack -RAMS, CPP, COSHH, site inductions, toolbox talks -without paying enterprise per-seat prices.Builders needing occasional RAMS on an ad-hoc basis who don't want a monthly subscription.General contractors who need template-based RAMS with a familiar library-picker workflow and don't require a full CDM suite.Builders learning the basics of CDM 2015 who want a free checklist-style walkthrough before committing to paid compliance tooling.Anyone willing to spend 1–3 hours per document on manual admin who already has Microsoft 365 and doesn't produce RAMS often.
Not ideal forNew product (launched 2025) -smaller customer base and shorter track record than established tools like HandsHQ.£15 per document becomes expensive fast once you need more than two RAMS a month -flat-rate tools pay for themselves quickly.Template-based only -no AI that generates site-specific RAMS from a plain-English job description.Does not produce site-ready RAMS, CPP, COSHH, or method statements -it's a learning tool, not a document generator.Each RAMS takes 1–3 hours to write from scratch -manual work that purpose-built tools do in minutes.
RAMSAI-generated, site-specific, edit in-browser.Template-based, per document.Template-based library.DIY -manual Word/Excel template, no substance database.
CPPFull Construction Phase Plans -not just RAMS.Basic CPP checklist, not a document generator.
COSHH
Method statementsTemplate-based.Manual Word template.
Site inductionsWorkers sign from their phone.
Worker cert tracking
Incident log
Permits to work
Site diary
Subcontractor tracking
Toolbox talks
PCPP importUpload an existing PCPP and reuse the structure.
Document checking
Data exportExcel exports natively.
AI chat

Why this matters

A team of one has different economics from a ten-person firm, and the parent best-rams-software-uk roundup doesn't quite fit. For a sole trader, the question isn't which tool has the deepest template library or the most collaboration features - it's how many RAMS you actually write a month and whether you can self-serve sign up without a demo. This page re-ranks the same tools through that lens, with an explicit breakeven figure so you can pick on maths rather than marketing.

Who each tool is for

At-a-glance fit per product - pulled from the same data that drives the snapshot table.

The Site Book

Best for
Small-to-mid UK builders (1–50 users) who need a full CDM pack -RAMS, CPP, COSHH, site inductions, toolbox talks -without paying enterprise per-seat prices.
Not ideal for
New product (launched 2025) -smaller customer base and shorter track record than established tools like HandsHQ.
Team size
1–50

RapidRAMS

Best for
Builders needing occasional RAMS on an ad-hoc basis who don't want a monthly subscription.
Not ideal for
£15 per document becomes expensive fast once you need more than two RAMS a month -flat-rate tools pay for themselves quickly.
Team size
Solo / occasional

RAMs App

Best for
General contractors who need template-based RAMS with a familiar library-picker workflow and don't require a full CDM suite.
Not ideal for
Template-based only -no AI that generates site-specific RAMS from a plain-English job description.
Team size
All contractors

CDM Wizard

Best for
Builders learning the basics of CDM 2015 who want a free checklist-style walkthrough before committing to paid compliance tooling.
Not ideal for
Does not produce site-ready RAMS, CPP, COSHH, or method statements -it's a learning tool, not a document generator.
Team size
Any -learning tool

Excel templates

Best for
Anyone willing to spend 1–3 hours per document on manual admin who already has Microsoft 365 and doesn't produce RAMS often.
Not ideal for
Each RAMS takes 1–3 hours to write from scratch -manual work that purpose-built tools do in minutes.
Team size
Any

The bottom line

Pick the option that matches how your team actually works.

Choose RapidRAMS if…

If you are a one-person builder writing one or two RAMS a month at most, RapidRAMS wins on pure maths. Roughly fifteen pounds per document with no subscription is cheaper than any flat-rate plan when your usage is that low. The breakeven against The Site Book's thirty pounds a month lands at about two RAMS a month - below that, pay-per-document is the honest pick.

Recommended for: Occasional jobs - one or two RAMS a month

Choose The Site Book if…

If you are a sole trader running regular site work and writing more than two RAMS a month, The Site Book is cheaper and wider. Flat-rate pricing from thirty pounds a month covers the full CDM suite - RAMS, CPP, COSHH, inductions, worker sign-off - in one bill, with self-serve signup and a free first project. Above the two-a-month breakeven, the maths flips in favour of flat rate.

Recommended for: Regular work - more than two RAMS a month

Why switch to The Site Book

  • Self-serve signup with no demo gate - start writing RAMS on a Monday morning without booking a sales call first.
  • Flat rate from thirty pounds a month covers the full CDM suite, so there is one bill instead of separate subscriptions for RAMS, CPP, and inductions.
  • Free first project lets a one-person team see real output - including a site-specific RAMS - before committing a card.
  • Mobile-first authoring and sign-off means the tool works from the cab of a van between jobs, not just from an office desk.
  • Breakeven maths is explicit: above two RAMS a month, flat rate beats pay-per-document on pure pounds.

Full breakdown per product

Strengths, weaknesses, fit, and the sources every claim came from.

The Site Book

The Site Book Ltd

from £30/mo

Best for
Small-to-mid UK builders (1–50 users) who need a full CDM pack -RAMS, CPP, COSHH, site inductions, toolbox talks -without paying enterprise per-seat prices.
Team size
1–50
Sweet spot
A principal contractor on a £50k–£5m domestic or commercial project who needs ready-to-sign compliance docs and worker sign-off from a phone.

Strengths

  • Only UK construction compliance tool that ships RAMS + CPP + COSHH + inductions + worker sign-off in one flat-rate subscription.
  • AI-generated documents are site-specific from a natural-language brief, not a template library you hand-fill -cuts writing a RAMS from 2 hours to under 5 minutes.
  • Worker sign-off, PCPP import, cert tracking, and document checking are included at the entry tier, not locked behind an enterprise plan.
  • Transparent flat-rate pricing starting at £30/mo -no per-seat surprise as the team grows.

Weaknesses

  • New product (launched 2025) -smaller customer base and shorter track record than established tools like HandsHQ.
  • No Procore / Autodesk Construction Cloud integrations yet -compliance docs live inside The Site Book and export as PDFs rather than syncing into a wider PM stack.
  • UK-focused content (CDM 2015, HSE guidance) -international contractors on non-UK projects would need to adapt the output.

RapidRAMS

RapidRAMS

£15 per document, no subscription

Best for
Builders needing occasional RAMS on an ad-hoc basis who don't want a monthly subscription.
Team size
Solo / occasional
Sweet spot
A sole trader who writes a RAMS a few times a year and wants pay-as-you-go pricing with no lock-in.

Strengths

  • Pay-per-document pricing is friction-free for builders who only need a RAMS occasionally -no monthly commitment.
  • Simple template-based workflow -quick turnaround for single documents without learning a compliance platform.

Weaknesses

  • £15 per document becomes expensive fast once you need more than two RAMS a month -flat-rate tools pay for themselves quickly.
  • No CPP, COSHH, site inductions, or any site management tools -RAMS-only scope.
  • Template-based -no AI site-specific generation, so every document is still manual work.

Source basis

RAMs App

RAMs App

from £24/mo

Best for
General contractors who need template-based RAMS with a familiar library-picker workflow and don't require a full CDM suite.
Team size
All contractors
Sweet spot
A small contractor who writes RAMS regularly and wants a purpose-built template-based tool at a mid-tier monthly price.

Strengths

  • Mature, focused template-based RAMS app with a familiar pick-from-library workflow.
  • Entry price from £24/mo is reasonable for contractors with straightforward single-document needs.

Weaknesses

  • Template-based only -no AI that generates site-specific RAMS from a plain-English job description.
  • No CPP, COSHH, site inductions, worker cert tracking, or site management -narrow RAMS-only scope.
  • Does not cover the full CDM 2015 compliance suite that principal contractors need on regulated projects.

Source basis

  • overview - https://rams.app (fetched 2026-04-15) · Vendor homepage -template-based RAMS positioning.

CDM Wizard

CDM Wizard

Free

Best for
Builders learning the basics of CDM 2015 who want a free checklist-style walkthrough before committing to paid compliance tooling.
Team size
Any -learning tool
Sweet spot
A first-time principal contractor who needs to understand the CDM 2015 framework before producing site-ready documents.

Strengths

  • Free to use -a low-barrier way to learn CDM 2015 basics before picking a paid compliance tool.
  • Focused checklist format is straightforward for builders new to CDM regulations.

Weaknesses

  • Does not produce site-ready RAMS, CPP, COSHH, or method statements -it's a learning tool, not a document generator.
  • No site management features at all (inductions, permits, incident log, worker tracking).
  • Suits only the narrow learning-CDM-basics use case -builders still need a separate tool for actual compliance documents.

Source basis

Microsoft 365 licence (£7.90+/mo per user) + your time

Best for
Anyone willing to spend 1–3 hours per document on manual admin who already has Microsoft 365 and doesn't produce RAMS often.
Team size
Any
Sweet spot
A builder who only writes a RAMS once a quarter and has time to manually fill in and version-control spreadsheets.

Strengths

  • Near-zero incremental cost if the team already has a Microsoft 365 subscription.
  • Familiar tooling -no learning curve for builders comfortable with Word and Excel.

Weaknesses

  • Each RAMS takes 1–3 hours to write from scratch -manual work that purpose-built tools do in minutes.
  • Manual version control (v1, v2, v2-FINAL, v2-FINAL2) makes it easy to send the wrong document or miss required sections.
  • No COSHH substance database, no worker sign-off, no audit trail -missing every feature regulators expect on a principal-contractor workflow.
  • Excel on mobile is painful -unusable for builders working from a phone on site.

Frequently asked questions

Short, straight answers - the same questions real builders ask.

What's the cheapest RAMS software for a sole trader?

It depends on how many documents you write. For one or two RAMS a month, RapidRAMS at roughly fifteen pounds per document is cheapest because you only pay when you draft one. For regular monthly work, The Site Book at thirty pounds a month flat covers unlimited documents plus the full CDM suite - CPP, COSHH, inductions, worker sign-off - so the per-document cost collapses as soon as you pass two documents a month.

Do I need full RAMS software if I work alone?

Yes, if you are carrying out work that needs a risk assessment and method statement - which under CDM 2015 is most paid construction work, including domestic jobs above the relevant thresholds. HSE inspectors do not waive the duty for sole traders. What you can skip is enterprise tooling built for H and S managers. A simple tool aimed at one-person teams is enough to produce site-specific RAMS quickly.

Can a sole trader legally produce their own RAMS?

Yes. There is no legal requirement to hold a specific qualification to produce a risk assessment or method statement. CDM 2015 requires that the person is competent - meaning experienced enough with the work and its hazards to assess them sensibly. A sole trader who knows their trade is typically competent to write their own RAMS, especially with software that structures hazards, controls, PPE, and emergency procedures for them.

What RAMS do I need for domestic work as a sole trader?

For a domestic job under CDM 2015, you still need a risk assessment and method statement for the work itself, plus a simple construction phase plan if the project crosses the threshold. A homeowner is the client but the duty-holder responsibilities sit on you as the contractor. The Site Book is built for exactly this audience and ships domestic-ready templates that cover the typical house extension, loft conversion, and kitchen-fit scenarios.

How we built this comparison

Based on publicly available vendor pricing and documentation reviewed 2026-04-15.

Every pricing, feature, and fit claim in this comparison is pulled from public vendor documentation and cross-checked against independent sources. The “source basis” footer on each product card lists the exact URLs and the date we fetched them. We revisit this page at least every 90 days - last reviewed on .

Read our editorial process →