Skip to main content
Start your first project

Honest comparison

Site Control vs GoContractor

GoContractor excels at one thing: getting contractors inducted, oriented and credential-checked in multiple languages before they reach site, then feeding compliance into your access control. Site Control covers that arrival step too, but also generates UK CDM documents (RAMS, CPP, COSHH) and runs the whole site after, attendance, live people-on-site, RFIs, toolbox talks and audit-grade exports, on transparent per-site pricing.

GoContractor is the better choice for high-volume multilingual pre-arrival onboarding; Site Control wins when you need UK CDM document generation plus everything that happens after the worker is on site, attendance, RFIs and audit.

Reviewed · next review

Nicola Dobbie, Founder of The Site Book
Nicola Dobbie·Founder, The Site Book

Feature and positioning details taken from GoContractor public vendor pages (gocontractor.com and the general-contractors solutions page) and a third-party GetApp directory pricing listing, all fetched 2026-06-06. GoContractor's price is quote-only; the ~$4,485/yr figure is directory-sourced and indicative, not vendor-published.

At-a-glance comparison

Pricing, fit, and feature coverage side by side.

FeatureThe Site Book Site ControlGoContractor
PricingFrom £675/site per month plus £5,000 one-off setup; volume tiers as sites scaleSubscription, quote-only; a GetApp directory listing indicates ~$4,485/year (indicative, not vendor-published), with no public setup fee
Team sizePer active site with unlimited workers (~75+ typical); multiple contractor companies per siteMid-to-large contractors and multi-project owners managing big, multilingual subcontractor pools
Best forPrincipal contractors and builders running live sites with subcontractors who need UK CDM documents generated plus on-site contractor access, attendance, RFIs and audit-ready evidence in one per-site tool.Larger general contractors and asset owners who need workers fully inducted, oriented and credential-checked in multiple languages BEFORE they arrive on site, then feed that compliance into an existing access-control or badging system.
Not ideal forNo biometric turnstiles or physical access control, so it cannot secure a Tier-1 perimeter the way hardware-led platforms like MSite can.Narrow point solution: it owns onboarding/orientation but does not generate UK CDM documents (RAMS/CPP/COSHH) or run site operations after arrival.
RAMS / CPP / COSHH generationGenerates UK RAMS, CPP, COSHH and method statements from the project brief — unique in this category.
Permits to work
Site inductionsDigital induction blocks check-in until acknowledged - readable in 9 worker languages.Core strength: standardized online site orientations/inductions completed before arrival, and only 100%-compliant workers are granted access via integrated badging. Source: gocontractor.
Multilingual inductions (9 languages)Workers read and acknowledge key H&S details in 9 languages at the entrance QR; the language used is recorded in the audit trail and translations are site-team reviewable.
RAMS sign-off (per worker)Per-worker RAMS acknowledgement can block check-in until the current version is signed; captured in the audit pack.
Worker cert trackingCSCS upload, internal review and expiry notifications.Monitors and manages worker qualifications/training and automatically alerts workers and subcontractors about expiring certifications. Source: gocontractor.com general-contractors page.
Right to workRecords Home Office share-code checks with outcome, expiry and an evidence file (manual verification, not a live API).Workers upload credentials and documents during onboarding, but vendor pages do not describe a formal UK right-to-work share-code verification flow specifically.
Contractor self-onboardingContractor self-join via the entrance QR with CSCS upload and approval.Designed around self-service pre-enrolment: workers and subcontractors complete onboarding and upload credentials online before reaching site. Source: gocontractor.com product pages.
QR / mobile sign-inPermanent entrance QR for guest sign-in/out and contractor self-join.Every worker gets a scannable QR code tied to their worker profile; software-only with no proprietary hardware. Source: gocontractor.com/who-we-serve/solutions-general-contractors.
GPS clock-in
Biometric access
Physical access control
Site attendanceCheck-in/out, history and a live people-on-site view.Provides worker check-in/check-out showing who is and isn't on site, but is positioned as compliance access rather than full T&A hours/timesheet capture. Source: gocontractor.
CIS payroll
Live people-on-siteTriggered evacuation + muster roll-call: snapshot who is on site, mark each person safe, export a roll-call PDF.Check-in/out shows who is and isn't on the worksite, but vendor pages do not describe a dedicated muster/evacuation roll-call view.
Multi-company isolationEach contractor company sees only its own workforce — test-verified.Built around prequalified subcontractors and per-worker profiles, implying contractor-scoped data, but no test-verified multi-company isolation model is publicly documented.
RFIsCreate, attach, comment, answer and close — unique in this category.
Document-review evidenceVersion-specific read/acknowledge audit chain.Captures completion of orientation/training modules and credential uploads, which evidences acknowledgement, but is not a version-specific document read/acknowledge audit chain.
Handover sign-offPer-plot, per-trade hand-over sign-off signed in person on one phone; certified PDF emailed to developer and contractor; per-plot progress board. Unique in this category.
Toolbox talks
Site inspections
Incident log
Plant / asset management
Workforce scheduling
Multi-site dashboard & exportsAttendance CSV, monthly H&S CSV/PDF and project audit-log exports.Provides automated multi-project reporting and analytics across onboarding/compliance without manual compilation. Source: gocontractor.com product/general-contractors pages.
Mobile appMobile-first: workers complete orientation and carry a scannable QR profile from their phone. Source: gocontractor.com product pages.
Offline modeOffline behaviour is not clearly documented on vendor pages; treat as unknown rather than a confirmed offline-capable mode.
Single sign-on (SSO)SAML single sign-on with Okta or Microsoft Entra; can be required across your company email domain.
Public APIRead-only REST API with scoped account keys, rate limiting and an OpenAPI 3.1 spec (projects, documents, workers, certifications, attendance).
Outbound webhooksSigned real-time webhooks — documents generated/signed, certificates expiring, workers checking in — with retries and a delivery log.

Who each tool is for

At-a-glance fit per product - pulled from the same data that drives the snapshot table.

The Site Book Site Control

Best for
Principal contractors and builders running live sites with subcontractors who need UK CDM documents generated plus on-site contractor access, attendance, RFIs and audit-ready evidence in one per-site tool.
Not ideal for
No biometric turnstiles or physical access control, so it cannot secure a Tier-1 perimeter the way hardware-led platforms like MSite can.
Team size
Per active site with unlimited workers (~75+ typical); multiple contractor companies per site

GoContractor

Best for
Larger general contractors and asset owners who need workers fully inducted, oriented and credential-checked in multiple languages BEFORE they arrive on site, then feed that compliance into an existing access-control or badging system.
Not ideal for
Narrow point solution: it owns onboarding/orientation but does not generate UK CDM documents (RAMS/CPP/COSHH) or run site operations after arrival.
Team size
Mid-to-large contractors and multi-project owners managing big, multilingual subcontractor pools

The bottom line

Pick the option that matches how your team actually works.

Large GC / asset owner with a big multilingual subcontractor pool

If your single biggest pain is pre-arrival onboarding in many languages feeding existing turnstiles, GoContractor is purpose-built for it. Choose Site Control when you also want CDM document generation and on-site operations in one place, accepting it has no biometric/turnstile hardware or CIS payroll.

UK builder or contractor needing CDM packs plus site control

Site Control is the stronger fit: it generates RAMS/CPP/COSHH and runs check-in/out, live people-on-site, RFIs and audit exports per site, work GoContractor does not do. Pick GoContractor instead if your only need is deep multilingual orientation.

Smaller UK site team wanting fast, no-hardware deployment

Site Control deploys with a permanent entrance QR and unlimited workers per site at a transparent price, no turnstile capex. GoContractor suits you less here, being an onboarding point tool oriented to larger, hardware-integrated programmes.

Full breakdown per product

Strengths, weaknesses, fit, and the sources every claim came from.

From £675/site per month plus £5,000 one-off setup; volume tiers as sites scale

Best for
Principal contractors and builders running live sites with subcontractors who need UK CDM documents generated plus on-site contractor access, attendance, RFIs and audit-ready evidence in one per-site tool.
Team size
Per active site with unlimited workers (~75+ typical); multiple contractor companies per site
Sweet spot
A principal contractor running one or more active sites who must generate the CDM pack, control who is inducted and on site, run RFIs, and produce audit-ready attendance and H&S exports without hardware.

Strengths

  • Generates the full UK CDM pack — RAMS, CPP, COSHH and method statements — and captures sign-off on site; no direct competitor in this category generates UK compliance documents.
  • Per-site pricing with unlimited workers (~75+) and test-verified multi-contractor-company data isolation, instead of per-seat or per-turnstile economics.
  • No hardware: a permanent entrance QR plus browser sign-in on the worker's phone means a new site goes live in days with no turnstile capex or install.
  • Combines RFIs, document-review evidence, CSCS and induction gating, attendance and audit-grade exports in one tool — plus SSO (Okta / Microsoft Entra), a scoped REST API and signed webhooks for enterprise IT.
  • Plot-by-plot hand-over sign-off: capture every trade signed off on every plot in person, with a certified PDF and a live progress board — no other tool in this category does per-plot trade sign-off.
  • Provable safety, not assumed: per-worker RAMS sign-off (which can block check-in until the current method statement is signed), right-to-work evidence records with expiry, and a triggered evacuation muster roll-call with a roll-call PDF — all rolled into one Audit Pack export.

Weaknesses

  • No biometric turnstiles or physical access control, so it cannot secure a Tier-1 perimeter the way hardware-led platforms like MSite can.
  • No CIS payroll or GPS-geofenced clock-in, so payroll-accuracy-led buyers may prefer Chime or Donseed.
  • No plant/asset management or workforce scheduling — adjacent operations tools cover those.
  • New plan on a recently launched product, with a shorter track record than established incumbents.

Source basis

  • pricing - https://thesitebook.co.uk/pricing (fetched 2026-06-06) · Site Control: from £675/site per month plus £5,000 one-off setup; volume tiers; unlimited workers per site.
  • features - https://thesitebook.co.uk/features/site-management (fetched 2026-06-06) · Per-site contractor access: QR sign-in, CSCS, induction gating, attendance, RFIs, document-review evidence, audit exports.
  • features - https://thesitebook.co.uk/site-control (fetched 2026-06-17) · Handover sign-off: per-plot, per-trade sign-off signed in person, certified PDF emailed to developer and contractor, per-plot progress board.
  • features - https://thesitebook.co.uk/features/site-management (fetched 2026-07-01) · June 2026 additions: per-worker RAMS sign-off, right-to-work evidence records, triggered evacuation/muster roll-call, and Audit Pack v2 evidence export.
  • features - https://thesitebook.co.uk/docs/api (fetched 2026-07-05) · July 2026 (#994): SAML SSO (Okta/Entra) with enforce-SSO, public REST API v1 with scoped keys + OpenAPI spec, signed outbound webhooks — Site Control tier.

GoContractor

GoContractor (Safety Plus)

Subscription, quote-only; a GetApp directory listing indicates ~$4,485/year (indicative, not vendor-published), with no public setup fee

Best for
Larger general contractors and asset owners who need workers fully inducted, oriented and credential-checked in multiple languages BEFORE they arrive on site, then feed that compliance into an existing access-control or badging system.
Team size
Mid-to-large contractors and multi-project owners managing big, multilingual subcontractor pools
Sweet spot
High-volume pre-arrival onboarding and orientation across many subcontractors, with credential expiry tracking and integration into third-party site access hardware.

Strengths

  • Best-in-class pre-arrival onboarding and orientation: workers are fully inducted and credential-checked before they ever reach the gate, cutting day-one delays.
  • Genuinely strong multilingual delivery, onboarding can be served in any language, which suits large, diverse subcontractor workforces.
  • Software-only with per-worker QR codes and credential-expiry alerts, so it deploys without hardware and slots into existing access-control/badging platforms.
  • Automated multi-project compliance reporting reduces manual paperwork for large general contractors and asset owners.

Weaknesses

  • Narrow point solution: it owns onboarding/orientation but does not generate UK CDM documents (RAMS/CPP/COSHH) or run site operations after arrival.
  • No RFIs, toolbox talks, inspections, incident log, or T&A/CIS payroll, so most on-site workflows live in other tools.
  • Pricing is quote-only; the only public figure (~$4,485/yr) is a third-party GetApp directory estimate, not vendor-published, making budgeting opaque.
  • Relies on integrating into separate access-control hardware rather than providing a no-hardware permanent entrance QR out of the box.

Related comparisons

Best Construction Site Access Software UK (2026)

No single tool wins for everyone: biometric platforms secure large perimeters, payroll-led tools nail time and attendance, and only The Site Book's Site Control generates the UK CDM pack while controlling per-site contractor access.

See comparison →

Best Contractor Site Portal Software UK

The Site Book is the best contractor site portal fit for small UK builders who need workers, subcontractors, visitors, and site participants to access assigned H&S information, attendance and files without becoming internal team seats.

See comparison →

Best Construction Site Attendance Software UK

The Site Book Site Control is the best fit for principal contractors running live UK sites who need site attendance tied to per-site contractor access, induction gating with CSCS credential capture, and the generated CDM pack in one tool; Procore fits enterprise project management, Velappity fits configurable mobile forms, and Evalu-8 fits broader UK EHS teams.

See comparison →

The Site Book Site Control vs HammerTech

HammerTech's breadth, permit depth and turnstile hardware suit large multi-site GCs, while Site Control is lighter, UK-CDM-first and transparently priced for builders who need RAMS/CPP/COSHH generation and fast per-site rollout.

See comparison →

Site Control vs MSite (Infobric) Compared

MSite (Infobric) owns biometric perimeter security for large secured sites, while Site Control is no-hardware, UK-CDM-first and transparently priced for small and mid sites.

See comparison →

Frequently asked questions

Short, straight answers - the same questions real builders ask.

What is the main difference between Site Control and GoContractor?

GoContractor is a contractor onboarding and orientation point solution: it gets workers inducted, multilingual-trained and credential-checked before they arrive, then feeds compliance into separate access control. Site Control covers that arrival step too, but adds UK CDM document generation (RAMS, CPP, COSHH) plus the on-site half, check-in/out attendance, live people-on-site, RFIs, toolbox talks and audit-grade exports. In short, GoContractor stops at the gate; Site Control runs the whole site.

Does GoContractor generate UK CDM documents like RAMS and CPPs?

No. GoContractor distributes and tracks orientation and training content and lets workers upload their own credentials, but it does not author UK CDM documents. There is no RAMS, CPP, COSHH or method-statement generation on its vendor pages. The Site Book's core platform generates those documents directly, which is the main reason builders pair Site Control with CDM compliance rather than treating onboarding software as their paperwork engine.

Can GoContractor track attendance and who is on site?

Partly. GoContractor offers worker check-in and check-out that shows who is and isn't on a worksite, tied to per-worker QR profiles. It is positioned as compliance-driven access, not full time-and-attendance with worked-hours capture or timesheet-to-pay. Site Control records check-in/out attendance, shows live people-on-site for muster, and produces attendance CSV and monthly H&S exports, so it goes further on the operational reporting side.

How does pricing compare between the two?

GoContractor is quote-only; the only public figure is a third-party GetApp directory estimate of roughly $4,485 per year, which is indicative rather than vendor-published, so real costs depend on a sales conversation. Site Control is transparent: 5,000 pounds one-off setup plus 675 pounds per active site per month, with volume tiers at 4-9 and 10-plus sites. You get a clear per-site number up front.

Does GoContractor need turnstiles or special hardware?

GoContractor is software-only and gives each worker a scannable QR code, but it is designed to integrate INTO existing access-control and badging platforms rather than supply the gates itself, so a full physical setup often assumes hardware you already run. Site Control deploys a permanent entrance QR with no hardware, contractor self-join and induction gating out of the box, which suits teams that want fast setup without turnstile capital expenditure.

Which should a UK construction business choose?

Choose GoContractor if your dominant need is high-volume, multilingual pre-arrival onboarding feeding existing access control, that is genuinely its strength. Choose Site Control if you want UK CDM document generation plus the whole on-site workflow, attendance, live people-on-site, RFIs, document-review evidence, toolbox talks, multi-company data isolation and audit exports, on transparent per-site pricing. Site Control is honest about its gaps: no biometrics, turnstiles, CIS payroll, GPS geofence, plant or scheduling.

How we built this comparison

Feature and positioning details taken from GoContractor public vendor pages (gocontractor.com and the general-contractors solutions page) and a third-party GetApp directory pricing listing, all fetched 2026-06-06. GoContractor's price is quote-only; the ~$4,485/yr figure is directory-sourced and indicative, not vendor-published.

Every pricing, feature, and fit claim in this comparison is checked against public vendor documentation and, where relevant, independent sources. The “source basis” footer on each product card lists the exact URLs and the date we fetched them. The internal freshness dashboard flags source evidence after 45 days; priority pricing is scheduled for monthly review and feature or ownership claims for quarterly review. Last reviewed on .

Next review due: .

Read our editorial process →