Honest comparison
The Site Book is the better fit for small UK builders who need RAMS, CPP, COSHH, inductions, and sign-off quickly; Velappity suits teams that want configurable field-service forms and can invest in setup.
Reviewed
Based on Velappity RAMS, risk-assessment, and pricing pages reviewed on 2026-04-21.
Pricing, fit, and feature coverage side by side.
| Feature | The Site Book | Velappity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | from £30/mo | RAMS/COSHH on Gold from GBP55/user/mo |
| Team size | 1–50 | 5+ |
| Best for | Small-to-mid UK builders (1–50 users) who need a full CDM pack -RAMS, CPP, COSHH, site inductions, toolbox talks -without paying enterprise per-seat prices. | Operations and H&S teams that want configurable inspection, RAMS, COSHH, reporting, assets, and client portal workflows in one broader field-service platform. |
| Not ideal for | New product (launched 2025) -smaller customer base and shorter track record than established tools like HandsHQ. | RAMS and COSHH sit on the Gold plan, which is GBP55 per user per month on monthly billing - expensive for small builders. |
| RAMS | AI-generated, site-specific, edit in-browser. | Custom form workflow; RAMS listed on Gold. |
| CPP | Full Construction Phase Plans -not just RAMS. | |
| COSHH | COSHH listed on Gold and risk-assessment pages. | |
| Method statements | RAMS-oriented form/report workflow. | |
| Site inductions | Workers sign from their phone. | Training documents and toolbox talks; not a dedicated induction flow. |
| Worker cert tracking | Training documents, not construction worker cert tracking. | |
| Incident log | Incident reports listed on Gold. | |
| Permits to work | ||
| Site diary | ||
| Subcontractor tracking | ||
| Toolbox talks | Listed on Gold. | |
| PCPP import | Upload an existing PCPP and reuse the structure. | |
| Document checking | ||
| Data export | ||
| AI chat |
Velappity is not a bad tool; it solves a broader field-service problem. The question is whether you want to configure a platform around your safety processes, or generate construction documents from a project brief. Small builders usually need the second thing first.
At-a-glance fit per product - pulled from the same data that drives the snapshot table.
Pick the option that matches how your team actually works.
The Site Book is the better fit for small UK builders who need RAMS, CPP, COSHH, inductions, and sign-off quickly; Velappity suits teams that want configurable field-service forms and can invest in setup.
Strengths, weaknesses, fit, and the sources every claim came from.
The Site Book Ltd
from £30/mo
Fieldimp Ltd
RAMS/COSHH on Gold from GBP55/user/mo
Pricing
See TheSiteBook pricing
Transparent plans for builders, contractors, and teams.
Start free
Try TheSiteBook free
Generate your first RAMS + CPP in minutes - no card required.
Every TheSiteBook feature
Related comparisons
Best COSHH Assessment Tools UK (2026)
The Site Book ranks first for builders who need COSHH assessments connected to RAMS and the CDM pack; Velappity and Evalu-8 suit broader EHS teams, while SafetyCulture is strongest for configurable inspections.
See comparison →
Best Site Induction Apps UK (2026)
The Site Book ranks first for small UK builders because induction sign-off is tied to the live project, RAMS, CPP, emergency plan, and audit pack; Evalu-8 and SafetyCulture suit larger EHS teams.
See comparison →
Best Construction Compliance Software (2026)
Full compliance suites ranked - The Site Book for CDM document creation at small-builder prices, Evalu-8 for broad enterprise EHS, Procore for integrated project management, and SafetyCulture for ongoing inspection workflows.
See comparison →
The Site Book vs Evalu-8 — UK Construction Compliance
The Site Book wins for 1–50 person UK builders at 10× lower pricing; Evalu-8 is the right call for enterprise EHS teams that need a multi-module platform across training, audits, and incident management.
See comparison →
Short, straight answers - the same questions real builders ask.
Choose The Site Book if you are a UK builder who needs RAMS, CPPs, COSHH assessments, inductions, and worker sign-off without building custom forms first. It is designed around CDM 2015 projects, so you brief the job once and generate the paperwork. Velappity is stronger when a team wants a flexible form platform across inspections, assets, client portals, and reporting.
Velappity makes sense for multi-site operations or compliance service providers that want configurable inspection forms, asset records, client portals, and reporting in the same system. If your business already has a health and safety manager who can design forms and maintain templates, that flexibility is useful. For small builders who simply need construction documents today, the setup step can slow the job down.
The Site Book starts from GBP30 per month for the full construction compliance workflow. Velappity publishes per-user pricing, with RAMS, COSHH, toolbox talks, incident reports, and training documents listed on the Gold plan at GBP55 per user per month on monthly billing. That can be fine for a structured operations team, but expensive for a two-person builder.
Velappity publicly describes RAMS, COSHH, inspections, reporting, assets, incident reports, toolbox talks, and training documents, but not a dedicated Construction Phase Plan generator or PCPP import. The Site Book includes CPP generation and a PCPP import workflow, so principal contractors can turn existing pre-construction information into the working project record and documents without rebuilding the pack manually.
Based on Velappity RAMS, risk-assessment, and pricing pages reviewed on 2026-04-21.
Every pricing, feature, and fit claim in this comparison is pulled from public vendor documentation and cross-checked against independent sources. The “source basis” footer on each product card lists the exact URLs and the date we fetched them. We revisit this page at least every 90 days - last reviewed on .