Skip to main content

Honest comparison

Site Control vs WhosOnLocation (MRI OnLocation)

WhosOnLocation is the lightest, most generic option here and owns emergency muster and mature presence tracking, while Site Control is the UK-CDM-first build for construction sites with document generation, induction gating, CSCS and RFIs.

WhosOnLocation (MRI OnLocation) is a generic workplace visitor-management and presence tool that excels at touchless sign-in and emergency muster, but it is not construction-specific. The Site Book Site Control is built for UK sites: it generates RAMS/CPP/COSHH, gates inductions until acknowledged, tracks CSCS and runs RFIs. Choose WhosOnLocation for offices and campuses; choose Site Control for CDM compliance on live construction sites.

Reviewed · next review

Nicola Dobbie, Founder of The Site Book
Nicola Dobbie·Founder, The Site Book

Pricing and feature claims are taken from MRI Software's public OnLocation product, pricing and help-centre pages, fetched 2026-06-06; figures may change — confirm on the vendor site.

At-a-glance comparison

Pricing, fit, and feature coverage side by side.

FeatureThe Site Book Site ControlWhosOnLocation (MRI OnLocation)
PricingFrom £675/site per month plus £5,000 one-off setup; volume tiers and annual prepayPublished from USD $60/location/month (annual ~$634/yr); tiered by yearly sign-in volume up to a Large tier of ~$304/month (~$3,180/yr, roughly £2,500), with a custom POA tier above that.
Team sizePer active site with unlimited workers (~75+ typical); multiple contractor companies per siteSingle reception desk through to multi-site facilities teams managing many locations.
Best forPrincipal contractors and builders running live sites with subcontractors who need UK CDM documents generated plus on-site contractor access, attendance, RFIs and audit-ready evidence in one per-site tool.Workplaces, offices, campuses and multi-occupier buildings that need touchless visitor and contractor sign-in plus reliable emergency muster — not construction-specific CDM compliance.
Not ideal forNo biometric turnstiles or physical access control, so it cannot secure a Tier-1 perimeter the way MSite/Biosite can.Generic workplace VMS, not construction-specific: no RAMS/CPP/COSHH generation, no CSCS card scheme, no block-until-complete CDM induction gating, and no RFIs.
RAMS / CPP / COSHH generationGenerates UK RAMS, CPP, COSHH and method statements from the project brief — unique in this category.
Permits to work
Site inductionsDigital induction blocks check-in until acknowledged.Supports contractor agreements and trigger-based documents/messages at sign-in, but not a true block-until-acknowledged CDM induction gate.
Worker cert trackingCSCS upload, internal review and expiry notifications.Can capture contractor compliance documents and expiries, but no CSCS-specific card scheme or UK competency model.
Right to workCSCS credential review; not a formal right-to-work share-code check.
Contractor self-onboardingContractor self-join via the entrance QR with CSCS upload and approval.Contractors can pre-register and complete agreements ahead of arrival via the contractor portal.
QR / mobile sign-inPermanent entrance QR for guest sign-in/out and contractor self-join.Touchless QR/mobile sign-in supported without mandatory hardware; kiosk and OnScan scanner are optional add-ons.
GPS clock-in
Biometric access
Physical access controlDoes not provide turnstiles itself but integrates with access-control/door hardware to trigger entry on sign-in.
Site attendanceCheck-in/out, history and a live people-on-site view.Tracks on-site presence with sign-in/out timestamps and reporting, though framed as presence rather than payroll T&A hours.
CIS payroll
Live people-on-siteLive people-on-site dashboard plus dedicated emergency evacuation/muster roll-call is a core strength.
Multi-company isolationEach contractor company sees only its own workforce — test-verified.Supports multiple locations and contractor companies, but is built for a single managing organisation, not contractor-company self-service data isolation.
RFIsCreate, attach, comment, answer and close — unique in this category.
Document-review evidenceVersion-specific read/acknowledge audit chain.Captures acceptance of contractor agreements and policy documents at sign-in, but not version-specific document-review acknowledgement chains.
Toolbox talks
Site inspections
Incident logHas alerting and emergency tooling; no dedicated construction incident/accident log out of the box.
Plant / asset management
Workforce scheduling
Multi-site dashboard & exportsAttendance CSV, monthly H&S CSV/PDF and project audit-log exports.Strong multi-location dashboards and presence/visitor reporting with exports across all sites.
Mobile appiOS and Android contractor app.Mobile apps for employees, hosts and evacuation roll-call, plus mobile contractor sign-in.
Offline modeOffline/evacuation continuity features exist for muster scenarios, but full offline operation is not the headline mode.

Who each tool is for

At-a-glance fit per product - pulled from the same data that drives the snapshot table.

The Site Book Site Control

Best for
Principal contractors and builders running live sites with subcontractors who need UK CDM documents generated plus on-site contractor access, attendance, RFIs and audit-ready evidence in one per-site tool.
Not ideal for
No biometric turnstiles or physical access control, so it cannot secure a Tier-1 perimeter the way MSite/Biosite can.
Team size
Per active site with unlimited workers (~75+ typical); multiple contractor companies per site

WhosOnLocation (MRI OnLocation)

Best for
Workplaces, offices, campuses and multi-occupier buildings that need touchless visitor and contractor sign-in plus reliable emergency muster — not construction-specific CDM compliance.
Not ideal for
Generic workplace VMS, not construction-specific: no RAMS/CPP/COSHH generation, no CSCS card scheme, no block-until-complete CDM induction gating, and no RFIs.
Team size
Single reception desk through to multi-site facilities teams managing many locations.

The bottom line

Pick the option that matches how your team actually works.

Office, campus or multi-occupier building needing visitor management and evacuation

WhosOnLocation is the better fit — its presence tracking and emergency muster are mature and it deploys without hardware. Site Control's construction-specific compliance would be largely unused here.

Main contractor running live UK construction sites under CDM

Site Control wins: it generates RAMS/CPP/COSHH, gates inductions until acknowledged, tracks CSCS expiry, isolates contractor-company data and runs RFIs — none of which WhosOnLocation does. Be honest that Site Control has no biometrics, turnstiles, CIS payroll, GPS geofence or plant register.

Smaller builder wanting fast, unlimited-worker site sign-in with compliance

Site Control fits better — unlimited workers per site and a full CDM pack beat per-location sign-in tiers; WhosOnLocation suits you only if you mainly need generic visitor logging and muster.

Full breakdown per product

Strengths, weaknesses, fit, and the sources every claim came from.

From £675/site per month plus £5,000 one-off setup; volume tiers and annual prepay

Best for
Principal contractors and builders running live sites with subcontractors who need UK CDM documents generated plus on-site contractor access, attendance, RFIs and audit-ready evidence in one per-site tool.
Team size
Per active site with unlimited workers (~75+ typical); multiple contractor companies per site
Sweet spot
A principal contractor running one or more active sites who must generate the CDM pack, control who is inducted and on site, run RFIs, and produce audit-ready attendance and H&S exports without hardware.

Strengths

  • Generates the full UK CDM pack — RAMS, CPP, COSHH and method statements — and captures sign-off on site; no direct competitor in this category generates UK compliance documents.
  • Per-site pricing with unlimited workers (~75+) and test-verified multi-contractor-company data isolation, instead of per-seat or per-turnstile economics.
  • No hardware: a permanent entrance QR plus mobile app means a new site goes live in days with no turnstile capex or install.
  • Combines RFIs, document-review evidence, CSCS and induction gating, attendance and audit-grade exports in one tool, replacing a stack of point solutions.

Weaknesses

  • No biometric turnstiles or physical access control, so it cannot secure a Tier-1 perimeter the way MSite/Biosite can.
  • No CIS payroll or GPS-geofenced clock-in, so payroll-accuracy-led buyers may prefer Chime or Donseed.
  • No plant/asset management or workforce scheduling — adjacent operations tools cover those.
  • New plan on a recently launched product, with a shorter track record than established incumbents.

Published from USD $60/location/month (annual ~$634/yr); tiered by yearly sign-in volume up to a Large tier of ~$304/month (~$3,180/yr, roughly £2,500), with a custom POA tier above that.

Best for
Workplaces, offices, campuses and multi-occupier buildings that need touchless visitor and contractor sign-in plus reliable emergency muster — not construction-specific CDM compliance.
Team size
Single reception desk through to multi-site facilities teams managing many locations.
Sweet spot
Facilities and security teams who want mature presence tracking and evacuation roll-call across offices, with optional ID-scan and desk-booking add-ons.

Strengths

  • Mature, well-proven presence management with a best-in-class emergency evacuation and muster roll-call — arguably the strongest in this comparison set.
  • Touchless QR/mobile sign-in with no mandatory hardware; optional kiosk and OnScan ID-scanning add-ons keep deployment light.
  • Transparent published pricing from ~$60/location/month with clear sign-in-volume tiers — rare in this market.
  • Strong multi-location dashboards and visitor/contractor reporting, backed by MRI Software's enterprise resources.

Weaknesses

  • Generic workplace VMS, not construction-specific: no RAMS/CPP/COSHH generation, no CSCS card scheme, no block-until-complete CDM induction gating, and no RFIs.
  • Per-location pricing scales by sign-in volume, so a busy ~75-worker construction site can outgrow tiers fast while still lacking trade-specific compliance features.
  • Right to Work, toolbox talks, site inspections and a proper incident log are not provided as construction-grade modules.

Frequently asked questions

Short, straight answers - the same questions real builders ask.

Is WhosOnLocation built for construction sites?

No. WhosOnLocation, now MRI OnLocation, is a generic workplace visitor and presence management system used across offices, campuses and multi-occupier buildings. It handles touchless sign-in, contractor agreements and emergency muster very well, but it does not generate UK RAMS, CPP or COSHH documents, track CSCS cards, or gate site inductions. Site Control is purpose-built for UK construction and CDM compliance instead.

How much does WhosOnLocation cost compared with Site Control?

WhosOnLocation publishes per-location pricing from about $60 a month, rising through volume tiers to roughly $304 a month (around £2,500 a year) before a custom quote tier. Site Control is £5,000 one-off setup plus £675 per active site each month, with volume discounts. The per-location floor buys sign-in and muster; Site Control's price buys a full UK compliance platform including document generation, induction gating and RFIs.

Does WhosOnLocation track CSCS cards and competency?

Not specifically. WhosOnLocation can capture contractor compliance documents and expiry dates and can scan ID through its optional OnScan add-on, but it has no CSCS card scheme or UK competency model. Site Control treats CSCS and credential tracking with expiry alerts as a core feature, and blocks check-in until the worker has completed the required induction, which a generic visitor-management tool is not designed to enforce.

What does WhosOnLocation do better than Site Control?

Emergency evacuation and muster is WhosOnLocation's standout strength, alongside very mature, widely deployed presence tracking and strong multi-location reporting. It is also the lightest, most generic tool to roll out across non-construction sites, with transparent published pricing. Site Control deliberately focuses on construction and does not try to match a dedicated VMS on generic office visitor flows or campus-wide muster across mixed building types.

Does Site Control replace a dedicated visitor management system?

For a construction site, yes: Site Control provides a permanent entrance QR, guest sign-in and out, contractor self-join, live people-on-site and audit-grade exports. For a corporate office estate with reception desks, mixed visitor types and campus-wide evacuation, a dedicated VMS like WhosOnLocation may suit better. Site Control is honest about its scope — it is a CDM compliance and site-access platform, not a general office VMS.

Can either tool isolate data between contractor companies?

Site Control provides multi-contractor-company data isolation, verified by tests, so each contractor company sees only its own workers, documents and records. WhosOnLocation supports multiple locations and contractor companies but is designed around a single managing organisation rather than contractor-company self-service isolation. If you run a site with many subcontractors who each need their own private view, Site Control's isolation model is the closer match to that requirement.

How we built this comparison

Pricing and feature claims are taken from MRI Software's public OnLocation product, pricing and help-centre pages, fetched 2026-06-06; figures may change — confirm on the vendor site.

Every pricing, feature, and fit claim in this comparison is pulled from public vendor documentation and cross-checked against independent sources. The “source basis” footer on each product card lists the exact URLs and the date we fetched them. We revisit this page at least every 90 days - last reviewed on .

Read our editorial process →